Since the five decades ago, the relationship between political democracy and economic growth is a significant argues. Section of nationwide examination takes displayed that a theoretical division of the effects of democracies governments against totalitarian governments on growth remainsaccompanied by unclear empirical outcomes that lead to an unresolved resolution of an agreement.Democracy supporters debate that people motivation for investment and work, the realdistribution of wealth on the boosting of private profit and market remain within free data and property control and scope of freedom (North 1990). In the economy, democrats may boundgovernment intervenes and they respond to common requests in areas such as, inspire sustainable and long-time growth, knowledge, health and equity (Roderick 1999, Lake and Baum 2001, Baum and Lake 2003). But democracies opponent debate that democracy can help people to take speedy care at the expenditure of beneficial enterprise cannot stay protected as ofinterests of rented persons and quickly assemble resources. Democrats are believed to exist at odds with class struggles, community and ethnic. Despite the fact that several writers respect dictatorial governments defeat conflicts, classify resistance and compulsory methods for swiftgrowth (Bhagwati 1995).Democracy is defined in various methods. While all modifications definition of democracy is nominated as the political regime in which those who are elected over competitive elections stay stable. Democratization of any country from an undemocratic regime can be preceded by a decrease in per capita GDP and unstable but estimated growth in long-term; on the other hand, authoritarian regimes have substantially improved their growth at the creation and failure in the long term (Ulubasoglu, 2006). The purpose for this is that non-democratic regimes are more effective when they originate for effecting critical policies, also ethnic determination and conflict but in the long-term are unstable, for the reason that they stay more encouraged to extract money (World Economic Forum, 2006). Democracy regimes about the institutions and policies that method the source and over that the values of equality and freedom remain considered and achieved directly or indirectly on companies or individuals that benefit from the approaches and they upsurge their growth, concentrating on them, which has an affirmative impact on the economy.Traditional Perspectives of democracy and growthDoes political democracy cause economic growth? According to Hobbes, dictatorial regimes gain more general improvement in public welfare because they cannot promote their own interests in other cases. Huntington (1968) also agrees with this view. Huntington argues that democracy has weak and delicate political institutions, and they demand popular earnings on profitable investment. Democratic regimes are susceptible to recourse to low-income groups and directly impossible by leaseholders for beneficial activities (Krueger 1974, Bhagwati 1982). Non-democratic countries can implement the tough economic policies that are essential aimed at growth, and stop the growing request on the growth of revenue for low revenue and functioning persons in general, also the shortage of social occupation due to class struggles, religious andethnic. Democrats can not defeat such conflicts. Also, markets must stay to promote economic growth, and totalitarian countries can easily enable such policies. Moreover, some level of progress is needed to advance democracy (Lipset’s hypothesis, 1959). In sum, this view means that political democracy is a luxury advantage that is not possible by developing countries. Rao(1984-5), Haggard (1990), Galenson (1959), Huntigton and Dminguez (1975) and Andreski(1968) are other advocates of the conflict view and authoritarian regime knowledge in the economy. The perspectives of the conflict astonished in the 1950s and 1960s.Today’s question of democracy and growth Nowadays the question of political democracy is more intensive, by the accumulation of research and a growing list of country experiences (such as Latin America, China, Russia). This view has prevented traditional barriers to adaptive argument since various aspects of the growth issues of the broader institutions have been recognized. In addition, scholars have divided from political democracy aspects such as the protection of property rights, labor market and commercial lawsthat previously were present devoted to political democracy are now observed as measure of economic democracy. Heretofore, the features of political democracy, such as political instability, regulatory quality, corruption, government efficiency and rule of law, were partially or completely connected to political democracy. It is also accompanying with further growth. Newly, the World Bank announced the “Doing Business” aspect of corporate issues. Specifically Djankoy et al. (2002a, 2002b, 2005), McLiesh, Shleifer and Djankoy (2005) and Botero et al. (2004) has assessed business rules and set the degree of comfort of the private sector in employment-based economies, registration and closure of businesses, protecting investors and enforcing contracts and dealing with licensing and paying taxes.This study explores mainly the empirical relationship between democracy and economic growth and my hypothesis is Democracy leads to economic growth. THEORETICAL LOGICDemocracy leads to economic growth because, through our democracy, we have stable and foreseeable institutions that are willing to instrument policies that are directed at private companies and hence democracy invests in public goods, investing in human capital, maintaining the rule of law, and protective human property rights. On the other hand, democracy is a requiredpart of people’s ability to live freely and independently. It is an institutional guarantee that policies and laws produced by a state are in route with the simple interests of the people. As a result, democracy is dominant to the quality of life and is a fundamental element in the ability of men and women to live freely and independently as human beings (Boris Begovic, 2012).Over conceptualisation, economic presentation is determined by on many features of state policy, but the most essential part is still democratic institutions. Empirically, modifications in institutions are recognised to be one of the most important elements of economic growth. This view, which is a good basis for recent empirical research on economic growth, is a key issue of the economic freedom index.How Democracy Effects On Growth?Democracy will in the long term lead to rise in economic growth, for the reason that democracies have permanent and expectable institutions and tend to provide policies for private firms. Although democracies are more likely to participate in large-scale distribution on a larger scale than governments, the effect is the sustainability of the redistribution of the fact that democracies impede entry, promote competition and innovation.The relationship between democracy and economic growth has led to many deliberations, research, and even astounding. The welfares of democracy are ability to recover the reliability and predictability of institutions that produces a structure for the business environment. There are two mechanics of economic growth: 1. Reserve of features of production (capital and labour, including human capital) 2. Rises in entire element productivity through technological development and progresses in efficiency The economic growth is established on the massive numeral of mutually independent resultsprepared by a huge number of capitalists on how to invest their investment and workforce in different commercial accomplishments. The incentives that affect investment resolutions are very significant to describe the growth method. These reasons are shaped by economic institutions, particularly those that are connected to the total and effective security of private property rights and unlimited economic freedom. The improved the protection of private property rights, the upper the predictable returns on investment, so economic negotiators invest more seriously in the aspects of production, thus growth go faster. Also, the bigger the investment in research and development, the bigger protection of intellectual property rights, resulting to technological progress, total factor productivity rise and enhanced economic growth. More economic freedom creates more prospects for discussion and more rivalry. Freer competition makes competitive force, which is an operative motivation for economic productivity (both allocative and productive), which donates to enhanced growth. Private property rights can be disrupted by private marauders or marauders in the government sector. Moreover, Public sector damages of private property rights can be illegal, such as legitimate and corruption. Destruction of property rights by the public sector can be more disturbing to growth than private predation. Therefore, the government’s priority should be to defend private property rights from any breach. Features of democracyDemocracy can be characterised by reference to its various elements:• Defence of minorities (including political minorities).• Civil liberties: freedom of communication of all requirements and political and economic interests.• Peaceful transition of power, based on election outcomes and legitimate law.• Government responsibility to people with a public dynamic role.• Free elections founded on the rule of “one person, one vote”. Government response to people with a role Citizens’ active contribution in civil liberties is potential in politics, enchanting into account all partialities and interests, political or economic. Now, we can discover that a democratic organisation will have emotional impact on economic growth. Though the focus of this paper will be on how democracy affects growth, the reverse will also be the foundation of growth from democracy. Political stability and predictabilityPolitical instability – demarcated as the trend to modification in the legislative or executivegovernment – can be erratic expectation in public policy and economic economics. Under circumstances of political instability, entrepreneurs stop investing because revenues are vulnerable by possible policy modifications, such as poor protection of private property rights. Democracy prepares political stability and enhancement predictable. Though constitutional and executive circumstances are restricted by general elections, the timing of the political process is quite different, unlike the self-employed. The democracy of the polar societies is lower for the reason that, among other things everybody can without restrictions express his own political interest. Free expression of political preferences in the long run, democracies tend to produce a defensible environment and positive incentives for investment, innovation and growth. Investing in human capitalInvesting in human capital is significant for growth, because there is an accumulation of more elements of invention and more labour productivity. These investments have two parts. One is the investment of individuals from time and strength to develop their human capital (for example, to learn) and the other is to participate in additional capitals required for the progression. Public spending on education and healthcare solves these kinds of liquidnessrestrictions. Then democracies from the entire population, not just elites are expected to make public investment in human capital in democracies more attractive than autocratic governments.However, traditionally, some authoritarian systems, such as totalitarian communist systems, providing negative investment in human capital as an unintentional result of indoctrination, which was the main motivation for education. Rule of lawProtection of private property rights for growth is valuable. Also, investments individual take place if private property rights are secure, as investors are ready for avoiding their return on investment, and intellectual property protection for investment in research and development is a major foundation of technological progress. As a final point, global protection of contractual rights strengthens and inspires the interchange of markets, and this intensive exchange, solidercompetitive pressure, and motivation for economic efficiency. Hence, rule of law makes both economic growths through mechanisms: the increase of aspects of production concludedinvestment and the increase of TFP. Making and keeping the rule of law is perhaps the principalimprovement of democracy in relationships of economic growth. Democratic governments are responsible to the people and they prepare universal protection of private poverty rights. Causality level of developmentAccording to causality, main topic is created on the foundation of the middle class and the formation of civil society systems that are independent of the state public life that the government cannot become controller. Moreover, proliferation in human capital and education, people who are educated are unlikely to achieve authoritarian rule. Furthermore, absolutismscountries are not fast growing in the long-time; economic growth carries out sources of death on dictatorial regimes. Also, it is vital to reminder that democracy at a higher level can remain extradomineering for economic growth. This outline is clarified by the detections that the foundationsof economic growth are moving with the amount of economic development. Reserve of production aspects at a lower level is very essential; on the other hand the total factor productivity at a higher level is significant, mostly remaining to technological development. Technological and innovation are dynamic in new entrances, and democracies are enhancedfalling barriers to access to contrast autocracy states. METHODOLOGYMeasurementThis paper prepares examination of the relationship between democracy and economic growth %. The analysis takes 147 countries as sample, with data from Quality of Government Standard dataset codebook. We also analyze data from economic institutions for the measure of growth %. According to the literature, there is indication for the relationship between democracy and economic growth. The approximation of this relationship indicates that the level of democracy can move from lower to higher level of democracy. Using democracy measure, it indicates that democracy increases the probability of growth %. The results in multiple regressions will include other controlling variables as well. As point out before, our sample in which data can be present obtainable to discover data involvesof 147 countries; and we usage the time era protected 2003 to 2008. In the analysis we use basesof data from Freedom House and polity (Djankov et al., 2007). These data make available the score between 0-10 scales. Zero exemplifies lower level of democracy and 10 show higher level of democracy. According to the study we shown, the score of democracy from Polity are established on annual foundations; but over sample era there is tiny time variation. Therefore, we usage scores that we create for the year 2003 for making democracy measure. This is coded as 1 for a country with high level of democracy, and 0 for countries with low level of democracy.For dependent variable we use growth % for its measurement. Economic growth, nonetheless, mentions to the affirmative variation in the production of goods and services in an economy over a given period, generally a long period. In preparation, the most exercise indicator to measure it is gross domestic product (GDP). GDP is the rate of all goods and services manufactured in the country for the duration of a year, encompassing by foreign companies (Robert Solow, 1924). Control VariablesI take care of control variables to prevent their theoretical effect on dependent variable.Firstly, we control Human Development Indicator (HDI) that pursues to explanation for human development. It associates three standards: the endurance of the people, the level of education and the level of wealth. The HDI illustrations very big transformations between countries, like the level of countries affording to their GNP per capita. However, there is no systematic connection between income level and human development. The standard of living measured by GNI per capita is an normal revenue and it so creates it potential to amount what an normalperson can consume to content his material requirements (to feed himself, to clothe himself, etc.). A high average income can hide high variations and hence, not truthfully return the standard of living of the population: a lesser portion of the population can very much obtain a large percentage of revenue. Second, how this upsurge in GDP per capita may as well have tookargumentative effects on the population or at smallest amount several of them. Creating extra can remain completed by expending more than rationally energy and rare resources. The determination of the HDI is to measure the level of human development in a country, in logic the level of well-being of the population. If it does not receipt into interpretation the difficulties of unfairness and environment, it is more qualitative than the simple GDP/capita. Consequently, the quality of democracy is improved in countries where income is higher, because these countries may have recovering capacity for improvement to patterned and stability on the government that avoid the practice of policies.Secondly, the literature shows that human capital and economic growth have a robustrelationship. Human capital has emotional impact on economic growth and it mentions to the knowledge, skill sets and inspiration that people have, which provide economic value. This can be measured by Human Capital Index/Investment (output-cost-income-based/school enrollment rates). Data from Human Capital Index are measured by diverse scales. But the greateststandardized data are coded from 0-1; in which 1 is standard capital and zero else. Third, it has been demonstrated that political instability has an impact on economic growth. This effect remains great when we narrow regime type or regime change. Unstable political regime, however, can diminish the speed of economic growth and investment (Palau-Country Review, 2017). This is measured by political Risk Index that detentions the level of risk pretended by government and investors created on economic features; and its scale varies from 0-10. Zero indicates high political risk and 10 show lower political risk.The literature demonstrations that the effects of regime type on economic growth have not recognized modifications in average growth rates between absolutism and democracies. There could still remain alteration in the variances. Democracy indicates related controls on leaders and could lead to similar economic presentation. Between autocracies, constitutional and institutional limitations are likely to be variable and frail. Furthermore, the personal inclinations of autocrats may be more significant than the personality alterations between democratic leaders. Information from the 1960-1987 (Erich Weede, 1996) period and scored from 0-10, prepare indication that there is bigger variation in growth amounts between autocracies than rate democracies. RESULTSThe table 1 shows the correlation -0,389, and the p-value 0,000 (99%). This means that there is significant relationship between democracy and growth. Table1 : Correlation between Index of Democracy and GDP Growth Index of DemocracyGDP Growth (%)Index of DemocracyPearson Correlation1-,389** Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 N165141GDP Growth (%)Pearson Correlation-,389**1 Sig. (2-tailed),000 N141162**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). The graph 1 indicates to what extend is the relationship between independent and dependent variables. The empirical analysis shows that when democracy increases, GDP growth increases as well. Graph 1: Scatterplot Democracy to Growth REGRESSIONVariables Entered/RemovedModelVariables EnteredVariables RemovedMethod1Regime Type, Human Capital Index, Political Stability, Level of Democracy (Freedom House/Imputed Polity)a.Entera. All requested variables entered. In the regression model (table 2), the result shows meaningful relationship between democracy and growth with 99% level of confidence. Table 2: Regression between control and dependent variables ModelUnstandardisedCoefficientsStandardisedCoefficientstSig. BStd. ErrorBeta 1(Constant)7,3491,602 4,587,000 Level of Democracy (Freedom House/Imputed Polity)-,405,175-,329-2,323,022 Political Stability-,594,462-,151-1,284,202 Human Capital Index-,784,579-,148-1,355,178 Regime Type,438,381,1681,149,253a. Dependent Variable: GDP Growth (%) After control variables’ analysis, the result shows the estimated coefficient of -0,329 for level of democracy variable that is statistically significant. By using 0-10 democracy scale, the relationship between democracy and growth % is still significant (-0,329). This mean that from the lower level to the higher level of democracy increases the probability of growth as well. CONCLUSIONThe interaction between democracy and economic growth embraces the impact of political freedom on the growth and impact of living standards at the level of democracy. With esteem to the definition of growth, analysis between countries increases the anticipated effect from sustaining the free market, rule of law, human capital and low consumption of government. While these variables and the primary level of GDP remain constant, the overall effect of democracy is on negative growth. There are some indications of a non-linear relationship in which democracy more likely to raise growth at a low level of political freedom, but it reduces economic growth when it reaches an average level of political freedom. With regard to the impact of economic development on democracy, examination illustrations that the progress of living – measured by a country’s real GDP , significantly increasing the likelihood that political institutions will become more democratic over time. Hence, political freedom seems to be a luxury, they will enjoy more democratic places, because this is in the best interest, and even if increased political freedom may have a negative impact on growth. In fact, rich countries can be responsible for a cutback in economic progress.There are strong rules in the relationship between democracy and economic growth. However, the causal mechanisms are complex, overlapping, and sometimes with balanced effects. There is no simple rule and no direct conclusion. In some cases, democracy has been shown to even be detrimental to economic growth, specifically as esteems the restructuring of compulsory income, and independent states can efficiently reject this political pressure. This theory is established by swift growth periods in independent countries.Though democracy in universal is valuable for economic growth, it is a solution that treats miraculously poverty and creates societies flourishing. These are long-term results. More democracy motivations on the provision of the rule of law and effectively allocates political pressure for restructuring, and the consequences of economic growth will be better.