p.p1 sites. Nonetheless, if you want, you can later

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.

0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px ‘Helvetica Neue’; color: #000000; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000} span.s1 {font-kerning: none} You shouldn’t make a site description long. Actually, shorter summaries could potentially have more sense and accessible understanding, then deeply detailed explanations. In most cases for summary you only need two – four sentences, which bring together key points about sites.Nonetheless, if you want, you can later on provide a deeper description of certain buildings, constructions or other architectural features.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

In case there already is a basic report upon the architectural site, the deeper explained and analysed report will be more relevant. Any description presented, should thus, target to put your site briefly into its landscape context, purify and bring together the information captured in your visual records, back up with the historic information, in case there is such, and capture and additional data that may not have been recorded yet. Naming the site is the first and vital information you need to present, National Grid Reference, enhanced by a short description of your findings. The simple locational information will give others the ability to find your site on a map. You can then make up your mind upon the amount of  written information and data, you will provide.

Some might say that it’s the basis that digital photography is invaluable for archeology, it may be considered to be the only or one of the most significant ways of photographic recording. However, taking into the account the state of technological development, there are robust arguments why it doesn’t seem to be such and is not particularly prone to appear such in the short-term.  The revolution took place in archaeology since the end of the twentieth century triggered by the development of digital imaging and further innovation in technology will lead to innovative usages in the field and lab. Yet, nowadays archeologists still rely on the past glass negatives with prints, those that still survived. For archeologists, whatever level technology has achieved, the real challenge is to preserve an archive, which will be able to last forever, presenting our cultural heritage that is equal to or wins the battle of time against the photographic standards of the past.