How Fathers afraid of tyranny? One reason the Founding

How did the Constitution guard against tyranny? And Why the Founding Fathers afraid of tyranny?Why the Founding Fathers afraid of tyranny? One reason the Founding Fathers were afraid of tyranny was that, ¨four years earlier….. control by a king¨(Background Document) The Founding Fathers had already experienced tyranny under King George III, that was precisely why they fought in the Revolutionary War. Before the Constitution was created, the nation functioned on was manifested by the Articles of Confederation. ¨Under the Articles….pay taxes¨ (Background Document). The newly formed United States was so afraid of tyranny that the Founders were willing to have a very weak centralized government that was ineffective.Tyranny is a cruel power in the hands of one individual, it has happened everywhere. Whatever the size or shape it is tyranny is a problem it’s a problem because it means too much power in the hands of one person or group. The Constitution stop all tranny by having ways, such as having the federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the large and small states both treated equally.  (Document B) Separation of powers, created by the three branches of government, helped guard against tyranny, by allowing the three branches to lean on each other, but still separate equal powers. The three branches of government protect Tyranny known as the legislative, judicial, and executive, help protect against tyranny by separating each power. This guar tyranny because it makes sure that no branch or anyone has more power than one another because they check each other. Document B states that in the Constitution article 1 section 1, article 2 section 1 clause 1, and article 3 section are about the three separate branches in our government and what responsibilities that each one holds.  Because of our government having three different branches each one has its own limited powers that make a democracy possible.The definition of the word “democracy” has changed. The way Americans and myself see the word doesn’t refer to a static system as it once did, it is ever changing and improving.A way to guard tyranny was the checks and balance, because of all the different branches of government can disagree with something that another branch is doing in order to keep everything in the government fair. The constitution shows this when it is put that the other branches can veto something that another branch is doing because it may be unconstitutional. (Document C) Checks and balances protects against tyranny because it make sure that one group in the government can do anything that would be unconstitutional. (Document C) For example, “congress can approve presidential nominations and impeach the President from office, but the President can veto a Congressional legislation.” (Document C) Another example is the president nominates judges, but the Court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. (Document C) Another example is the court can make laws unconstitutional, but congress can also impeach judges. Document C states that by the Checks and Balances protect against tyranny. The guard against very bad treatment was big states and small states balance which means that the size of a state should have a input on whether it has more say in the government than one less of it size. Another way to guard Tyranny was the Constitution guards against tyranny is Federalism. “Federalism is just a thing for the powers given to the states, the government, and powers the two share.” Document A states that the central government can decide and make trades, and to declare war. The states can set up local governments, hold elections and build/create schools. In all document James Madison trying to say “is that the central and state governments have enough power that they don’t control everything. The central government has enough power to help some of the other country’s needs and same to the the state government, the state government has more than enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From  dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents a tyranny and war from happening.     Separation of Powers guards us from tyranny by dividing the branches of government. Document B it states that, “Liberty requires that the great departments of powers should be separate and distinct.” This means that the Legislative Branch (Congress, House of Representatives and Senate) should be completely different from the Executive (President) or the Judicial Branch (Courts). The different branches could have different viewpoints. This may stop tyranny from making people not do what they want and to try to take over the government they think the government is hard to take over, since there are three separate branches government.Because of this, they can rule in whichever way they see fit without worrying about losing their jobs.  This allows them to rule against the government, and prevent them from going beyond their Constitutional authority.  In one of the most serious cases ever to face a sitting President, the Supreme Court ruled against Richard Nixon (U.S. vs. Nixon) when he tried to argue his White House tapes were personal property.  This led, in part, to the resignation of the President. I just want to state and add to the post above this one and the next that, because I believe one of the answers is that, prevents tyranny, is an independent court system.  When Federal judges are appointed, they are approved or rejected, almost always approved by the Senate, and once they are approved, they are on the bench until they die or resign.  They cannot be fired unless they commit a crime. Because of this, they can rule in whichever way they see fit without worrying about losing their jobs. This allows them to rule against the government, and prevent them from going beyond their Constitutional authority.  In one of the most serious cases ever to face a sitting President, the Supreme Court ruled against Richard Nixon when he tried to argue his White House tapes were personal property.  This led, in part, to the resignation of the President.  So I would argue that the court system established by the Constitution is specifically our greatest protection against tyranny. How did the United States achieve this? After the Revolutionary War, the Founding Fathers chose to build a legislature that was of the general population, by the general population, and for the general population. Thusly, they expected to keep the more than likely plausibility of oppressive power falling under the control of one or a couple of individuals, at the end of the day an avoidance of oppression was required .A constitution is an arrangement of tenets that look to set up the obligations, powers and elements of the different organizations of government. They likewise direct the connection between and among the establishments and characterize the connection between the state and the person. There are a wide range of sorts of constitutions. An arranged constitution would depict and dig in the structure of government, the connection between various parts of government and the connection amongst government and nationals. So it would along these lines avert discretionary government. A presentation of a classified constitution would secure the privileges of the subjects. It is contended that native’s rights must be ensured on the off chance that they are dug in a systematized constitution. Do gun rights protect against tyranny? The US Supreme Court is considering what could be a  landmark decision on individual gun rights. An unspoken argument is that armed citizens would make any usurper think twice before subverting the Constitution.The Constitution tries to prevent tyranny in a number of ways. When most people think of this question, they think of the Bill of Rights.  That document prevents tyranny by listing all of the things that the government cannot do to people. However, this is not really the way in which the Constitution prevents tyranny.  The provisions of the Bill of Rights can be overridden more or less whenever a strong majority wants to “The Bill of Rights” is just a statement and that cannot prevent the government from violating our rights. What the Constitution really does to prevent tyranny is to set up a government with separation of powers and checks and balances.  This is meant to keep the government relatively weak so that it is hard for the government to tyrannize us. So, the Constitution’s real check against tyranny is the set-up of government.  It puts blocks in the way of government action so that it will be harder for tyranny to arise.In conclusion there are many forms of very bad treatment, and the many ways people have prevented very bad treatment, ours being The Constitution. The Constitution is a defender, who tackles very bad treatment down and retrieves the power. Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and Balancing the Power amongst Small and Large States has guarded America against terrible treatment for a long time and ideally will for a considerable length of time to come. In conclusion he Separation of Powers shields us from terrible treatment along these lines.